Html RID

We leverage
solid governance
practices.

We believe that sound governance is essential to optimal risk management. This is why we are continuously refining our own practices. In addition, we have implemented a series of processes to help optimize the governance systems of our portfolio companies and external managers.

10

Québec companies
supported in their
implementation of sustainable
business practices

308

discussions to
raise awareness on ESG factors
among our portfolio companies
and external managers

37536

resolutions voted on
at 3,635 shareholder meetings
held by our portfolio companies

278

technology
risk analyses

1

Our principles
of sound governance

CDPQ’s activities are governed by a number of laws, regulations and policies. We adhere to strict rules of governance in order to achieve our investment objectives rigorously, efficiently and transparently.

CDPQ is governed by three bodies (Figure 10):

  • The Board of Directors
  • The Executive Committee, composed of the President and Chief Executive Officer and senior executives from various business units
  • The Executive Committees of the subsidiaries and their Boards of Directors1

Our governance rules evolve continuously to better take into account current issues. This is why in 2023 we updated our two Codes of Ethics: one for employees and another for the Board of Directors. This evolution enabled us to:

  • Deepen the understanding of ethical rules by updating how they are presented
  • Meet best practices with practical examples and decision-making tools
  • Update our rules, which take into account our evolving practices and new trends in this area
  • Align our Codes with those of our subsidiaries, Ivanhoé Cambridge, Otéra Capital and CDPQ Infra, to facilitate management and strengthen our governance1

1. On January 24, 2024, CDPQ announced the integration of its subsidiaries—Ivanhoé Cambridge and Otéra Capital—through a process that began at the end of January 2024 and will conclude 18 to 24 months later.

Figure 10
Organizational structure
(December 31, 2023)
This organizational chart shows the different levels of CDPQ’s organizational structure as at December 31, 2023, which include:
•	The Chairman of the Board
•	The Board of Directors and its various committees
•	The President and Chief Executive Officer and Executive Committee
•	The various business units, both investment and general services
•	The three specialized subsidiaries
Note that on January 24, 2024, CDPQ announced the integration of the activities of its subsidiaries, Ivanhoé Cambridge and Otéra Capital, in a process that began at the end of January 2024 and will take 18 to 24 months.

1. On January 24, 2024, CDPQ announced the integration of its subsidiaries—Ivanhoé Cambridge and Otéra Capital—through
a process that began at the end of January 2024 and will conclude 18 to 24 months later.

Organization

OUR GOVERNANCE AT EACH STEP OF THE INVESTMENT PROCESS

CDPQ relies on its Sustainable Investing Policy to ensure that ESG factors are taken into account in its portfolio management. In both pre- and post-investment, we encourage the deployment of constructive capital.

PRE-INVESTMENT

We avoid investing in companies or sectors that are:

  • Unsustainable for society or the environment
  • Prohibited by applicable Canadian law or international conventions
  • Entities subject to Canadian financial prohibitions

Once an investment opportunity meets our requirements, and based on certain thresholds, it is submitted to committees based on the sector concerned and the results of our ESG analyses (Figure 11).

Figure 11
A rigorous process for approving investments
Pre-investment
POST-INVESTMENT

We monitor our total portfolio using specialized tools, resources and rigorous analytical processes. This enables us to assess, anticipate and manage ESG issues that our portfolio companies may face in the future. We then hold discussions internally and with stakeholders to optimize our decision-making.

When an issue arises, an escalation procedure is initiated. Depending on the nature of the asset and the circumstances, a discussion group is formed with business unit risk managers, members of the Risk Management, Sustainability, Communications and Brand teams, as well as the team for the asset class concerned, in order to develop an overall sense of the situation. We can then make an informed decision and enter into discussions with the company to implement the mitigation measures needed to address the issue.

We apply the same analytical process for publicly traded companies. When the risk appears too great, we choose to divest as a last resort.

Post-investment
2

Our advisory role with portfolio companies

Our portfolio companies benefit from our ongoing support on sustainability issues.

We use the following levers of influence to support their adoption of best practices:

  • Strategic support
  • Dialogue and engagement
  • Shareholder voting

STRATEGIC SUPPORT

Our teams have extensive expertise in providing post-investment support to our portfolio companies. We support them as they integrate sustainability considerations into all areas of their business: ESG strategy, disclosure, Board composition, business risk management and executive compensation.

In Québec, we have provided support to 10 companies seeking to optimize the integration of ESG issues into their business strategies—see the case study on Workleap.

Our teams also worked together this year to create a Playbook for Controlled Operating Companies. The purpose of the playbook is to ensure that best practices in governance and management are maintained throughout the life cycle of the companies concerned. CDPQ’s investment teams are responsible for its application.

As part of our Sustainable Development Action Plan 2023–2028, we committed to increasing the number of Québec companies in our portfolio that take ESG factors into account in their business strategies in order to foster their resilience and long-term performance.

Support

DIALOGUE AND ENGAGEMENT

CDPQ maintains an open dialogue with its portfolio companies and external managers to understand their realities and the challenges and opportunities they face (Figure 12). We use these exchanges to share our expectations concerning their governance practices, risk management and integration of ESG factors into their business plans—see the Inigo case study.

In 2023, we conducted more than 308 discussions with 129 companies and 81 external managers. This honest dialogue, based on trust, fosters the development of privileged relationships with our partners as well as a comprehensive view of developments in our portfolio.

We have also relied on the EOS team at Federated Hermes, a globally recognized provider of shareholder engagement services, to engage with more than 528 portfolio companies in which we are shareholders. This collaboration has enabled us to increase our engagement capacity on subjects such as artificial intelligence, the circular economy and water management.

Figure 12
Topics addressed with our portfolio companies and external managers
This circular chart shows the main topics discussed with our portfolio companies and external managers in 2020.

The main topics addressed were:
•	Governance in 57% of cases 
•	Social issues in 21% of cases 
•	The environment in 22% of cases This circular chart shows the main topics discussed with our portfolio companies and external managers in 2020.

The main topics addressed were:
•	Governance in 57% of cases 
•	Social issues in 21% of cases 
•	The environment in 22% of cases
This circular chart shows the main topics discussed with our portfolio companies and external managers in 2020.

The main topics addressed were:
•	Governance in 57% of cases 
•	Social issues in 21% of cases 
•	The environment in 22% of cases This circular chart shows the main topics discussed with our portfolio companies and external managers in 2020.

The main topics addressed were:
•	Governance in 57% of cases 
•	Social issues in 21% of cases 
•	The environment in 22% of cases
This circular chart shows the main topics discussed with our portfolio companies and external managers in 2021.

The main topics addressed were:
•	Governance in 58% of cases
•	Social issues in 31% of cases
•	The environment in 11% of cases This circular chart shows the main topics discussed with our portfolio companies and external managers in 2021.

The main topics addressed were:
•	Governance in 58% of cases
•	Social issues in 31% of cases
•	The environment in 11% of cases
This circular chart shows the main topics discussed with our portfolio companies and external managers in 2021.

The main topics addressed were:
•	Governance in 58% of cases
•	Social issues in 31% of cases
•	The environment in 11% of cases This circular chart shows the main topics discussed with our portfolio companies and external managers in 2021.

The main topics addressed were:
•	Governance in 58% of cases
•	Social issues in 31% of cases
•	The environment in 11% of cases
This circular chart shows the main topics discussed with our portfolio companies and external managers in 2022.

The main topics addressed were:
•	Governance in 52% of cases
•	Social issues in 35% of cases
•	The environment in 13% of cases This circular chart shows the main topics discussed with our portfolio companies and external managers in 2022.

The main topics addressed were:
•	Governance in 52% of cases
•	Social issues in 35% of cases
•	The environment in 13% of cases
This circular chart shows the main topics discussed with our portfolio companies and external managers in 2022.

The main topics addressed were:
•	Governance in 52% of cases
•	Social issues in 35% of cases
•	The environment in 13% of cases This circular chart shows the main topics discussed with our portfolio companies and external managers in 2022.

The main topics addressed were:
•	Governance in 52% of cases
•	Social issues in 35% of cases
•	The environment in 13% of cases
This circular chart shows the main topics discussed with our portfolio companies and external managers in 2023.
The main topics addressed were:
•	Governance in 54% of cases
•	Social issues in 31% of cases
•	The environment in 15% of cases This circular chart shows the main topics discussed with our portfolio companies and external managers in 2023.
The main topics addressed were:
•	Governance in 54% of cases
•	Social issues in 31% of cases
•	The environment in 15% of cases
Dialogue and engagement

SHAREHOLDER VOTING

We use shareholder voting, in accordance with our Policy Governing the Exercise of Voting Rights of Public Companies, to express our convictions, particularly in the areas of governance, climate and DEI.

Our Sustainability team leads this activity throughout the year. We encourage engagement with and support for our portfolio companies as a complement to shareholder voting, in order to engage them in dialogue prior to and during annual general meetings.


In 2023, we voted on:

37,536

resolutions, including shareholder proposals and management proposals, on several topics at

3,635

shareholder meetings held by our portfolio companies


The topics most frequently discussed in 2023 were appointments to Boards of Directors as well as disclosure on climate change and social issues.

Figure 13
The various topics targeted by the shareholder proposals on which we were called upon to vote
This stacked bar chart show the topics of shareholder proposals which break down as follows in 2020:
•	Governance: 91.3%
•	Social: 5.1%
•	Environment: 3.6% This stacked bar chart show the topics of shareholder proposals which break down as follows in 2020:
•	Governance: 91.3%
•	Social: 5.1%
•	Environment: 3.6%
This stacked bar chart show the topics of shareholder proposals which break down as follows in 2021:
•	Governance: 88.9%
•	Social: 6.0%
•	Environment: 5.1% This stacked bar chart show the topics of shareholder proposals which break down as follows in 2021:
•	Governance: 88.9%
•	Social: 6.0%
•	Environment: 5.1%
This stacked bar chart show the topics of shareholder proposals which break down as follows in 2022:
•	Governance: 85.3%
•	Social: 9.9%
•	Environment: 4.8% This stacked bar chart show the topics of shareholder proposals which break down as follows in 2022:
•	Governance: 85.3%
•	Social: 9.9%
•	Environment: 4.8%
Shareholder voting
OUR RATE OF SUPPORT

Through the vigilant exercise of our shareholder voting rights, we seek to strike a fair balance between respect for our environmental and social convictions and the creation of long-term value for our depositors. In the absence of extenuating circumstances, we vote against the appointment of a director of a public company when the company has fewer than 30% women on its Board or does not have a sufficiently ambitious climate plan.

We have adopted guidelines to assist us in our positioning. For example, we do not necessarily support all shareholder proposals, as some are deemed too restrictive and not rooted in the company’s reality to allow true progress.


Such decisions are reflected in our rate of support for shareholder proposals:

62%

support for proposals on environmental issues

49%

support for proposals on social issues


To maximize our support rate, we actively work on reviewing, and sometimes even developing, proposals so that they will meet the interests of shareholders while remaining achievable by the companies concerned. We transparently publish our voting positions after each shareholder meeting.

Rate
of support
3

Our technology
risk management

Disruptive technologies and cyberattacks are becoming increasingly sophisticated and represent a growing risk for businesses. They can have an impact on both the service offering and operations. In addition, rapid technological advances in generative artificial intelligence, which has the capacity to produce new content, also present opportunities and threats for some of our portfolio companies. Lastly, new profiles have emerged of the cybercriminals targeting critical infrastructure, partly as a result of geopolitical tensions.

We regularly monitor the risks in our total portfolio, including through analyses that help our investment teams better target the risks associated with technological disruption and cybersecurity. Our processes enable us to monitor all these risks and support some of our portfolio companies to strengthen their technological posture, advise them and help them respond to an incident.

In 2023, we carried out targeted analyses of several technologies and activity sectors. Among other things, we conducted a review of the impact of generative artificial intelligence on CDPQ’s portfolio. We are closely monitoring developments in this area.


In 2023, our teams performed 278 technology risk analyses.

Case studies

Workleap, a company founded in Québec and active around the world, offers a software platform that simplifies talent management and the use of Microsoft 365 productivity tools. Its business solutions are used by more than 20,000 companies in over 100 countries.

We are supporting Workleap as it pursues its acquisition strategy, which aims to broaden the offering on its platform, penetrate new markets and create more value for clients. This is the first external partnership for the company, which has been self-financed and profitable since its inception. Through an approach based on collaborative support, we are helping implement an ambitious acquisition strategy and a solid governance structure consisting of external directors. Our wide-ranging discussions have also helped Workleap acquire tools and processes that will help this Québec flagship crystallize its long-term future and continue growing global sales.

Inigo is a global company specialized in the insurance and reinsurance of the risks associated with complex and major events. Founded in 2021, the company has integrated ESG factors upstream in its business model and strategy.

Inigo invests heavily in research on catastrophes to better understand the changing nature of climate risks and integrate these observations into its underwriting decisions. In its first year of operation, it defined sustainability risk appetite indexes in underwriting and investment, and in 2022 it became a member of ClimateWise, a TCFD-aligned network. Inigo has also forged strategic partnerships with nature-related philanthropic organizations to have a positive influence beyond the traditional insurance value chain.

CDPQ advised the company on developing its ESG and risk management frameworks, including the establishment of DEI and risk KPIs. As a young company, Inigo needed to focus on attracting, developing and retaining diverse and committed talent, as well as on creating a solid governance structure. CDPQ played an advisory role in support of this process.

We held discussions with Probe Gold, a Canadian gold mining company, to guide it on adopting governance best practices following its transition, in January 2023, from the TSX Venture Exchange to the Toronto Stock Exchange.

We discussed a variety of topics, and particularly those of interest to investors such as CDPQ, including the composition of the Board of Directors and its committees, stock option plans and compensation disclosure. Since our discussions, Probe Gold has enhanced disclosures related to the structure of its executive compensation and has pursued efforts to move toward governance best practices in Board and committee composition, including gender diversity. These actions are aligned with its business strategy and will ensure better risk management.